Search for: "Entergy Operations, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2014, 10:20 pm
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am
[#Energy/Nuclear, #CA2]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. in San Leandro, Calif., Siemens Power Generation Inc. in Orlando, Fla., and Entergy Operations Inc. in Russellville are being cited for failing to comply with crane-related hazards. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:54 am
Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 10:55 am
Power Blocks 1 and 2 are expected to be acquired by Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Arkansas, Inc., respectively. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 9:32 am
DiNapoli Friday raised concerns with the storage of nuclear fuel at Entergy Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:57 am
Dutifully applying the Oakwood Healthcare criteria to electrical workers of a utility company, just as the Board had done in Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (2011), an NLRB Regional Director properly found a group of dispatch center employees were neither statutory supervisors nor managerial employees under the NLRA, and thus, they were entitled to unionize. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:48 am
Entergy Operations, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
The Vermont Department of Public Service (DPS) and the New England Coalition (NEC) petition for review of a decision of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, Commission), issuing to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:59 am
Entergy argued that Oakwood Healthcare wasn’t new law—it simply adopted the rule set forth in Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v NLRB, a 2001 Fifth Circuit decision—so the Board couldn’t cite a change in law to justify its contrary conclusion here. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:36 am
Finding that the company could have reassigned him to a position that did not require a gas mask and the arbitrator arguably applied the company’s collective bargaining agreement, the court affirmed the decision of the court below (Entergy Operations, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:06 am
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 663 F.3d 556, 568, 570-71 (2d Cir. 2011). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:08 am
Entergy Operations, Inc., 5th Cir., No. 16-30924, August 4, 2017. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:44 am
ENTERGY CORPORATION VS. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
SurplusEQ.com Inc., 2013 WL 2211629 (D. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:48 am
Entergy Operations, Inc., the Fifth Circuit reversed a trial court judgment in favor of the employer holding that the trial court’s determination that the FWW method was the proper method for determining the potential overtime liability for arguably misclassified employees was premature and further holding that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the employer and employee had agreed to use the fluctuating work week method. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:39 am
Entergy Operations, Inc. case, the court also stated that a tender back requirement might motivate employers to act improperly, knowing that the employee would have a difficult time tendering back. [read post]
